I have a nice wife, a nice fief too, a castle on a hill with a magnificent view. I have fertile lands, and villages that thrive, hundreds of troops who somehow stay alive. My coffers are heavy, my warband is fed, my enemies see my banner and occasionally drop dead. I have horses and armor, silver and grain, a hall full of nobles complaining again. By every measure, I’ve won at this game. I’ve conquered, grown wealthy, and built up my name. Yet I stand on my battlements when the campaigning is done, watching the mountains fade with the sun. My wife is beside me. My kingdom is strong. My vaults overflow. But something feels wrong. I’ve everything a lord could possibly acquire… Maybe what’s missing another fief to desire. submitted by /u/t-o-m-u-s-a [link] [comments]
Level 39, hold somewhere around 40 fiefs, castles and cities combined. Have lead Ragnar and nords to victory, vanquished all Kings but hakim. I easily defeat armies 3-4 times as large as mine. What are benefits of breaking from Ragnar and becoming king?
Explanation mainly in title. I have crushed and lead the nord armies to total victory except ahmerrad and Barriye. This whole time I’ve been loyal to ragnar in the name of stability, but at this point, I am wondering if I should break from Ragnar and declare myself king over either ahmerrad or barriye after I take them. It would be hell trying to retake all of ragnars holdings that I’ve won for him, but I feel like it could also make for an interesting twist. Should I help Ragnar finish his conquering of calradia or break from him and try and fight him in a civil war? This is my first play through.
Submitted June 15, 2019 at 12:18AM by Budmuncher http://bit.ly/2ZubhMd
Comments
Post a Comment