Where to begin... So the Battanians get into their fateful war with Vlaandians, but the western empire declared war upon their new Vlaandian neighbors. The western empire and the battanians pushed back the Vlaandians, but then the Aserai attacked the Western Empire. The Vlaandians made peace with the Battanians to focus their efforts on the western empire, and though the Battanians were doing well on their own, the Sturgians declared war on them. Battanians lose Flintolg castle but gain the Kranirog and Mazhadan castles, and then they claim Sturgia-owned Epicrotea during the Sturgian's battle against the Western Empire. The Khuzait declare war on the Sturgians and claim Tyal from them, so the Sturgians make peace with the Battanians to focus on the Khuzait. The western empire loses ground to both the Aserai and the Vlaandians, so they are forced to make peace with the Vlaandians. As the Aserai are recovering from intense wars of keeping Tubilis castle and Garontor castl...
Level 39, hold somewhere around 40 fiefs, castles and cities combined. Have lead Ragnar and nords to victory, vanquished all Kings but hakim. I easily defeat armies 3-4 times as large as mine. What are benefits of breaking from Ragnar and becoming king?
Explanation mainly in title. I have crushed and lead the nord armies to total victory except ahmerrad and Barriye. This whole time I’ve been loyal to ragnar in the name of stability, but at this point, I am wondering if I should break from Ragnar and declare myself king over either ahmerrad or barriye after I take them. It would be hell trying to retake all of ragnars holdings that I’ve won for him, but I feel like it could also make for an interesting twist. Should I help Ragnar finish his conquering of calradia or break from him and try and fight him in a civil war? This is my first play through.
Submitted June 15, 2019 at 12:18AM by Budmuncher http://bit.ly/2ZubhMd
Comments
Post a Comment