The 1.4.15 update, as i understand it with my limited knowledge, nerfed cavalry in AI vs AI battles, so Khuzaits and Vlandians, in this playthrough, haven't steam rolled anyone. But to think Caladog could get those dirty tree fuckers to actually push to the western sea is mind boggling to me. Even Husn Fulq has stayed Aserai this whole time. I think the change they made makes the game more unpredictable, and more interesting in the long run. Really like this update so far TW, thank you. Now just unfuck smithing stamina so I dont take a whole ass year to get 20 levels and I'd be truly thankful. submitted by /u/RamshackleHunt22 [link] [comments]
Do not take this as an insult to the original game, but, why are the graphics so bad by 2008 standards?
I love the gameplay of Mount and Blade: Warband, but when I first got it, the visuals were jarring to me. My justification for this was that it released a long time back. Only to find out it released in 2010.
Having played games from 2010 before M&B: Warband, like Halo: Reach, Call of Duty: Black Ops, Fallout: New Vegas, Just Cause 2 this honestly baffled me, and today I found that Warband is an expansion. Now, to be clear, the visuals did not hurt my experience at all (I still played it regularly until I completely fucked up my character and made him a broke sack of piss), but I digress.
The original Mount and Blade still looks inferior to games from earlier in the 2000’s, like all the Halo games up to that point. My question is, is there any reason for this? Again, sorry if I sound negative. I really do like this game.
Submitted June 16, 2019 at 02:18PM by BloodKingX http://bit.ly/2WJnw5B
Comments
Post a Comment