I'm playing with some mods that heavily restrict recruitment, so my army is almost entirely bandits and mercenaries. On land, Monchug's army would destroy mine, but this isn't a land battle and he gifted me several amazing prizes. The only way this could've been better is if Monchug died instead of his companion. submitted by /u/Glorf_Warlock [link] [comments]
So I thought about a battle royale mode for the game and did a little google search and saw some others already came up with the idea. But then I developed a much more suiting battle royale idea for M&B.
A Campaign Map Battle Royale!
-Instead of spreading players on a large map as individual. Spread them on campaing map as army leaders.
-There wil be no loot like other battle royale games. But men that you can recruit from villages, castles and cities. (There may be loot actually. Such as; food, armour, horses.)
-People will encounter each other and battle with their armies and one of them will win and the loser will be eliminated from the contest. (Or the loser can choose to fight in the winners army, making losing fun too.)
-Winner takes the lost sides warriors that are not killed. (Lost sides warriors join the winner side because they respect the commander of the winners and wanna fight for him/her :) .)
-You could say people will not fight till the end to preserve their armies number. Well there will be personal and group exp. Even tho people that do that ca have 100 soldiers against 20, they wont have the trained warriors. Also the more you kill, the more real players fighting for you in your army.
-Circle getting smaller can be simulated as volcanoes erupting around and lava getting closer, flood, some kind of plague etc, depending on maps.
So I hope you like my idea, I really think this would make for a very very different battle royale experiance and the idea of the loser having the option to join the winning side makes the game much more fun imo, that even if you lose you can still fight to win.
Submitted March 28, 2018 at 07:58AM by Zen_21 https://ift.tt/2E279I3
Comments
Post a Comment