I know a lot of players don't stick to a monotone cultural getup when they play, but a lot of players probably do what I do; try to stick to culturally appropriate armours and weapons for the culture I am playing. I take this mentality with me to smithing as well, where I try to smith and use weapons that suit my characters culture appropriately. But I have some exceptions; I often use animal pelts for shoulder armour when playing as a Vlandian or Imperial. If I play as a Sturgian I may use some Khuzait armour. And if I play as a mercenary or Lord for a different cultural faction than my character is from, I may use a mix of regional armours and use my own culture for a weapon. Example; I played a Nord corsair mercenary for the Empire. I used gilded scale Imperial armour with gilded scale shoulderguards, golden pirate gauntlets and boots, and a brass Aserai helmet with a Nord one handed sword with gilded pummel and handguard. Anyone else give themselves similar cultural restrict...
Feels like it. I've just had a nostalgic attack and started a new campaign in vanilla. I was trying to get the best army comp possible (Huscarls, Vaegir Archers and Swadian Knights) but I'm just wondering if it's not best to just have Swadian Knights.
Most blows just scratch them, same for their horses, and they just charge and stomp every other troop.
Other troops have their perks too, but they get killed more often. Huscarls get shot by archers while they are focusing on another enemy. Archers get destroyed by the cavalry or any good infantry troop. But Swadian Knights are just all terrain.
Am I missing a better comp?
Submitted August 19, 2019 at 12:25AM by FunkyMacri https://ift.tt/2YW4Vtc
Comments
Post a Comment