I mean I play it mainly as Role play, so winning it is not my goal, but I definitely want to be successful. Usually, getting first city is pretty hard, because having less than 200 troops, building siege camp, fending off enemy lords roaming around my siege camp requires big heap of luck. Then expanding the kingdom without clans is hard, even with two or three it gets hard against fully established kingdoms. However, weekly I see many posts about finished game, great strategic win, destroying whole kingdoms singlehandedly.... I am by no means beginner, having 2K+ hours in Warband (partially napoleonic wars as regiment member, but still many hours in Floris, Pendor and so on), 700+ hours in Bannerlord. I use Diplomacy, RBM so it is harder, but still... submitted by /u/Top_Leopard_9528 [link] [comments]
This is my first time actually joining Sarleon and my first time using an army that fields a lot of heavy cavalry, and I've never noticed before how much it sucks to use a heavy cavalry focused army in Sarleon territory. Almost every battlefield I get is hilly or outright mountainous, in addition to being littered with trees. It seems that every other factions map is designed so that they have a sort of "home field advantage"(for example, Ravenstern's mountain heavy land is good for their archers, and the D'Shar's wide open fields facilitate their horse archers), except for Sarleon's. Why does the faction that specializes in heavy cavalry occupy a territory that is terrible for using heavy cavalry?
Submitted November 30, 2021 at 01:48AM by Airtightspoon https://ift.tt/3d0xEBF
Comments
Post a Comment