I mean I play it mainly as Role play, so winning it is not my goal, but I definitely want to be successful. Usually, getting first city is pretty hard, because having less than 200 troops, building siege camp, fending off enemy lords roaming around my siege camp requires big heap of luck. Then expanding the kingdom without clans is hard, even with two or three it gets hard against fully established kingdoms. However, weekly I see many posts about finished game, great strategic win, destroying whole kingdoms singlehandedly.... I am by no means beginner, having 2K+ hours in Warband (partially napoleonic wars as regiment member, but still many hours in Floris, Pendor and so on), 700+ hours in Bannerlord. I use Diplomacy, RBM so it is harder, but still... submitted by /u/Top_Leopard_9528 [link] [comments]
Who's the worst starting King in your opinion to pledge allegiance? Ragnavad has been a literal detriment to my Sturgia campaign, he feels the need to constantly be in two wars at once; are we winning a war and making actual map progress? Oh better declare war the opposite side of the map too. And he doesnt even bother helping he just sits in Balgard 24/7.
[link] [comments]
Comments
Post a Comment