I mean I play it mainly as Role play, so winning it is not my goal, but I definitely want to be successful. Usually, getting first city is pretty hard, because having less than 200 troops, building siege camp, fending off enemy lords roaming around my siege camp requires big heap of luck. Then expanding the kingdom without clans is hard, even with two or three it gets hard against fully established kingdoms. However, weekly I see many posts about finished game, great strategic win, destroying whole kingdoms singlehandedly.... I am by no means beginner, having 2K+ hours in Warband (partially napoleonic wars as regiment member, but still many hours in Floris, Pendor and so on), 700+ hours in Bannerlord. I use Diplomacy, RBM so it is harder, but still... submitted by /u/Top_Leopard_9528 [link] [comments]
From what I read in this forum, most people critize the updates since the DLC heavily.
It seems like those patches make the game worse rsther than better - like with tbe last patch where they removed the bonus from defending sieges and some other siege mechanics.
And apoatebtly keep 'fixing' things that noone needed fixed, instead of implementing QoL stuff or deeoer mechanics (e.g. actual diplomacy ).
What are the the good patches since the DLC - apart from naval warfare - that have be implemented?
And what are the worst changes?
[link] [comments]
Comments
Post a Comment