Where to begin... So the Battanians get into their fateful war with Vlaandians, but the western empire declared war upon their new Vlaandian neighbors. The western empire and the battanians pushed back the Vlaandians, but then the Aserai attacked the Western Empire. The Vlaandians made peace with the Battanians to focus their efforts on the western empire, and though the Battanians were doing well on their own, the Sturgians declared war on them. Battanians lose Flintolg castle but gain the Kranirog and Mazhadan castles, and then they claim Sturgia-owned Epicrotea during the Sturgian's battle against the Western Empire. The Khuzait declare war on the Sturgians and claim Tyal from them, so the Sturgians make peace with the Battanians to focus on the Khuzait. The western empire loses ground to both the Aserai and the Vlaandians, so they are forced to make peace with the Vlaandians. As the Aserai are recovering from intense wars of keeping Tubilis castle and Garontor castl...
So i read through the post, saw all the deleted comments and the mod post, and, yeah fair enough I can put together what happened there.
But in that poll i saw someone mention this community was more toxic than the grand strategy game communities, wich got me curious. First i'd want to actually verify that since, you know. But if it's the case, how? We're competing with Hearts of Iron "Invading the USSR the 30th time as germany" IV and Europa "Culture convert Turkey" Universalis. How did Mount and blade attract more toxicity?
Submitted July 29, 2021 at 08:57AM by LeonardoXII https://ift.tt/3zNWWMS
Comments
Post a Comment