Where to begin... So the Battanians get into their fateful war with Vlaandians, but the western empire declared war upon their new Vlaandian neighbors. The western empire and the battanians pushed back the Vlaandians, but then the Aserai attacked the Western Empire. The Vlaandians made peace with the Battanians to focus their efforts on the western empire, and though the Battanians were doing well on their own, the Sturgians declared war on them. Battanians lose Flintolg castle but gain the Kranirog and Mazhadan castles, and then they claim Sturgia-owned Epicrotea during the Sturgian's battle against the Western Empire. The Khuzait declare war on the Sturgians and claim Tyal from them, so the Sturgians make peace with the Battanians to focus on the Khuzait. The western empire loses ground to both the Aserai and the Vlaandians, so they are forced to make peace with the Vlaandians. As the Aserai are recovering from intense wars of keeping Tubilis castle and Garontor castl...
I have been wondering:
Is holding land as a minor faction (without being in a kingdom at all, be it as vassal or king) an intended gameplay feature?
It has one major advantage: Nobody will decleare war ON you, but you can still attack others and later make peace. So war is entirely on your own terms. (Maybe this is an oversight and will get patched?)
But there are also drawbacks compared to being a proper kingdom, that somewhat balance it out:
- no policies
- no armies
- no recruitment of additional clans (you can still have your own clan parties though)
[link] [comments]
Comments
Post a Comment