I started by grinding my clan for like 20 in game years and just captured rebelling towns. After awhile I had a large chunk of the map sprawled out everywhere just under my clan. I found out that no kingdom can wage war on you if you’re a clan. So I basically just worked on my cities and made them generate a large daily income. It got to the point where I had kingdoms like Battania and Aserai down to a couple fiefs and surrounded. I would then wage war on them as a clan and win after a long war of attrition. Not being a kingdom means you have like 0 expenses so I had a ridiculous amount of denars like 30 million. I started a kingdom shortly after and have been buying vassals left and right as well as chewing through entire empires. It’s crazy how expensive running a kingdom is though. Even with that amount of money you will burn through a lot… Is this a good strategy or too long and painstaking? submitted by /u/SignificantThanks310 [link] [comments]
I was playing warband due to it being on gamepass, I had played freeman guerrilla warfare (mount n blade with guns), now i usually don’t care too much about graphics but seeing the bannerlord was out I bought it. Now when I look I see a lot of people saying that it isn’t as good and all, is warband better? Submitted July 31, 2021 at 07:52PM by Spforza https://ift.tt/2V9w1MK